Skip to content

Delete OI classic archive #1614

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2025

Conversation

endolith
Copy link

The archive should just be in the git history/branches, not in a folder. The classic version can be checked out as a worktree if needed. Having it in a folder clutters up the repo and is confusing when doing code-wide searches, finding seemingly-relevant references that are actually obsolete, or when using tools like Cursor that look for things throughout the repo and get confused about new and old things with the same name.

Describe the changes you have made:

Reference any relevant issues (e.g. "Fixes #000"):

Pre-Submission Checklist (optional but appreciated):

  • I have included relevant documentation updates (stored in /docs)
  • I have read docs/CONTRIBUTING.md
  • I have read docs/ROADMAP.md

OS Tests (optional but appreciated):

  • Tested on Windows
  • Tested on MacOS
  • Tested on Linux

The archive should just be in the git history, not in a folder.  The
classic version can be checked out as a worktree if needed. Having it in
a folder clutters up the repo and is confusing when doing code-wide
searches, finding seemingly-relevant references that are actually
obsolete, or when using tools like Cursor that look for things
throughout the repo and get confused about new and old things with the
same name.
@Notnaton Notnaton merged commit 8cd1eb9 into OpenInterpreter:development Mar 30, 2025
@endolith endolith deleted the remove_archive branch March 30, 2025 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants