Skip to content

chore: Feature/kafka consumer #905

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 35 commits into from
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

chore: Feature/kafka consumer #905

merged 35 commits into from
Jun 19, 2025

Conversation

hjgraca
Copy link
Contributor

@hjgraca hjgraca commented Jun 18, 2025

Please provide the issue number

Issue number: #904

Summary

Changes

Adds a new Kafka utility to the library which is useful for processing events from Kafka.

User experience

Please share what the user experience looks like before and after this change

Checklist

Please leave checklist items unchecked if they do not apply to your change.

Is this a breaking change?

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

  • Migration process documented
  • Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 18, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the internal Maintenance changes label Jun 18, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.22744% with 104 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.15%. Comparing base (4145acc) to head (397a476).
Report is 43 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
....Powertools.Kafka/PowertoolsKafkaSerializerBase.cs 79.49% 42 Missing and 31 partials ⚠️
...afka.Protobuf/PowertoolsKafkaProtobufSerializer.cs 79.31% 15 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...rtools.Kafka.Avro/PowertoolsKafkaAvroSerializer.cs 81.25% 6 Missing ⚠️
...rtools.Kafka.Json/PowertoolsKafkaJsonSerializer.cs 88.88% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...src/AWS.Lambda.Powertools.Kafka/ConsumerRecords.cs 81.25% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #905      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    76.95%   77.15%   +0.19%     
===========================================
  Files          264      272       +8     
  Lines        10292    10846     +554     
  Branches      1164     1263      +99     
===========================================
+ Hits          7920     8368     +448     
- Misses        1998     2068      +70     
- Partials       374      410      +36     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the github-actions Changes in GitHub workflows label Jun 18, 2025
@hjgraca hjgraca requested a review from leandrodamascena June 18, 2025 22:43
Copy link
Contributor

@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing work @hjgraca! Ship it!!!

hjgraca added 2 commits June 19, 2025 10:40
…gistry formats; add tests for various message index scenarios
Copy link

@hjgraca hjgraca merged commit 67c2a9e into develop Jun 19, 2025
11 checks passed
@hjgraca hjgraca deleted the feature/kafka-consumer branch June 19, 2025 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
github-actions Changes in GitHub workflows internal Maintenance changes size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants