-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
chore: Feature/kafka consumer #905
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…able for KafkaEvent
… setters and XML documentation
…s and enhance Avro deserialization error handling
…ey-value pairs and add Protobuf serialization
…ization in PowertoolsKafkaProtobufSerializer
…date JSON deserialization
… dynamic code attributes
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #905 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 76.95% 77.15% +0.19%
===========================================
Files 264 272 +8
Lines 10292 10846 +554
Branches 1164 1263 +99
===========================================
+ Hits 7920 8368 +448
- Misses 1998 2068 +70
- Partials 374 410 +36 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…ion tests for Kafka JSON serializer
…nsumerRecord types and primitive values
…ctionalTests covering key deserialization scenarios
…; update deserialization logic and tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Amazing work @hjgraca! Ship it!!!
…; improve null handling and test cases
…gistry formats; add tests for various message index scenarios
…r handling; update tests for missing schema scenarios
…ific handling; improve readability and maintainability
…and add tests for various scenarios
|
Issue number: #904
Summary
Changes
Adds a new Kafka utility to the library which is useful for processing events from Kafka.
User experience
Checklist
Please leave checklist items unchecked if they do not apply to your change.
Is this a breaking change?
RFC issue number:
Checklist:
Acknowledgment
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.
Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.