Skip to content

feat: add loopvar linter #4182

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

karamaru-alpha
Copy link
Contributor

@karamaru-alpha karamaru-alpha commented Nov 4, 2023

I'd like to add https://github.com/karamaru-alpha/loopvar.
This linter detects places where loop variables are copied.

For Go 1.21(set GOEXPERIMENT=loopvar) and Go 1.22~, it is unnecessary to copy loop variables because these variables have per-iteration scope instead of per-loop scope.

I understand that introducing this linter might be a bit premature, but I added it thinking it will be useful in the future.

cf. Fixing For Loops in Go 1.22

For Go 1.22, we plan to change for loops to make these variables have per-iteration scope instead of per-loop scope.

Go 1.21 includes a preview of the scoping change. If you compile your code with GOEXPERIMENT=loopvar set in your environment, then the new semantics are applied to all loops.

golangci-lint run --no-config --disable-all -E loopvar ./test/testdata/loopvar.go
test/testdata/loopvar.go:12:3: The loop variable "i" should not be copied (Go 1.22~ or Go 1.21 GOEXPERIMENT=loopvar) (loopvar)
		i := i // want `The loop variable "i" should not be copied \(Go 1.22~ or Go 1.21 GOEXPERIMENT=loopvar\)`
		^
test/testdata/loopvar.go:16:3: The loop variable "v" should not be copied (Go 1.22~ or Go 1.21 GOEXPERIMENT=loopvar) (loopvar)
		_v := v // want `The loop variable "v" should not be copied \(Go 1.22~ or Go 1.21 GOEXPERIMENT=loopvar\)`
		^
test/testdata/loopvar.go:30:3: The loop variable "i" should not be copied (Go 1.22~ or Go 1.21 GOEXPERIMENT=loopvar) (loopvar)
		i := i // want `The loop variable "i" should not be copied \(Go 1.22~ or Go 1.21 GOEXPERIMENT=loopvar\)`

Signed-off-by: karamaru-alpha <mrnk3078@gmail.com>
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Nov 4, 2023

Hey, thank you for opening your first Pull Request !

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 4, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@karamaru-alpha karamaru-alpha marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2023 18:59
Signed-off-by: karamaru-alpha <mrnk3078@gmail.com>
@ldez ldez added blocked Need's direct action from maintainer linter: new Support new linter labels Nov 5, 2023
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Nov 5, 2023

In order for a pull request adding a linter to be reviewed, the linter and the PR must follow some requirements.

  • The CLA must be signed

Pull Request Description

  • It must have a link to the linter repository.
  • It must provide a short description of the linter.

Linter

  • It must not be a duplicate of another linter or a rule of a linter. (the team will help to verify that)
  • It must have a valid license (AGPL is not allowed) and the file must contain the required information by the license, ex: author, year, etc.
  • The linter repository must have a CI and tests.
  • It must use go/analysis.
  • It must have a valid tag, ex: v1.0.0, v0.1.0.
  • It must not contain init().
  • It must not contain panic().
  • It must not contain log.fatal(), os.exit(), or similar.
  • It must not modify the AST.
  • It must not have false positives/negatives. (the team will help to verify that)
  • It must have tests inside golangci-lint.

The Linter Tests Inside Golangci-lint

  • They must have at least one std lib import.
  • They must work with T=<name of the linter test file>.go make test_linters. (the team will help to verify that)

.golangci.reference.yml

  • The linter must be added to the list of available linters (alphabetical case-insensitive order).
    • enable and disable options
  • If the linter has a configuration, the exhaustive configuration of the linter must be added (alphabetical case-insensitive order)
    • The values must be different from the default ones.
    • The default values must be defined in a comment.
    • The option must have a short description.

Others Requirements

  • The files (tests and linter) inside golangci-lint must have the same name as the linter.
  • The .golangci.yml of golangci-lint itself must not be edited and the linter must not be added to this file.
  • The linters must be sorted in the alphabetical order (case-insensitive) in the Manager.GetAllSupportedLinterConfigs(...) and .golangci.reference.yml.
  • The load mode (WithLoadMode(...)):
    • if the linter doesn't use types: goanalysis.LoadModeSyntax
    • goanalysis.LoadModeTypesInfo required WithLoadForGoAnalysis() in the Manager.GetAllSupportedLinterConfigs(...)
  • The version in WithSince(...) must be the next minor version (v1.X.0) of golangci-lint.
  • WithURL() must contain the URL of the repository.

Recommendations

  • The linter should not use SSA. (SSA can be a problem with generics)
  • The linter repository should have a readme and linting.
  • The linter should be published as a binary. (useful to diagnose bug origins)

The golangci-lint team will edit this comment to check the boxes before and during the review.

The code review will start after the completion of those checkboxes (except for the specific items that the team will help to verify).

If the author of the PR is a member of the golangci-lint team, he should not edit this message.

This checklist does not imply that we will accept the linter.

@ldez ldez self-requested a review November 5, 2023 00:38
Signed-off-by: karamaru-alpha <mrnk3078@gmail.com>
@Antonboom
Copy link
Contributor

Antagonist of #1404.
Naming loopvar is confusing.

@karamaru-alpha
Copy link
Contributor Author

karamaru-alpha commented Nov 6, 2023

@Antonboom
Thank you for the valuable information!
Is #1404 scheduled to be introduced? If so, it may be necessary to rename this linter to something like "antilooppointer".

@karamaru-alpha karamaru-alpha deleted the feat/loopvar branch February 13, 2024 19:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blocked Need's direct action from maintainer linter: new Support new linter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants