Skip to content

Add dynamic tools support to MCP server #401

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

floatingIce91
Copy link

@floatingIce91 floatingIce91 commented Jun 16, 2025

Description

Adds support for dynamic tools in MCP server, allowing tools to be generated at runtime based on context and request parameters. This enables servers to provide flexible, context-aware tooling that can adapt to different scenarios without requiring static tool definitions.

Solves issue #402

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • MCP spec compatibility implementation
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Code refactoring (no functional changes)
  • Performance improvement
  • Tests only (no functional changes)
  • Other (please describe):

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

Additional Information

Priority Order:

  1. Session tools (highest priority)
  2. Static/Global tools (middle priority)
  3. Dynamic tools (lowest priority - fallback only)

Thread Safety:

  • Dynamic tools configuration is set once during server initialization
  • Read-only access during runtime, no locking required
  • Dynamic tool functions are called without server-level synchronization

Design Decisions:

  • Separate list and handler functions for better separation of concerns
  • Dynamic tools checked last to avoid overriding core functionality
  • Middleware support ensures consistent behavior with static tools

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced support for dynamic tools, allowing tools to be listed and handled dynamically alongside existing static tools.
    • Added configuration options to enable dynamic tools and provide custom listing and handling behaviors.
  • Enhancements

    • Tool listing now merges dynamic tools with static and session-specific tools, ensuring seamless integration and prioritization.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This change adds support for dynamic tools in the MCPServer by introducing a new internal structure and server option. The server can now list, validate, and handle dynamic tools at runtime, merging them with static and session-specific tools. Tool listing and invocation logic is updated to incorporate dynamic tools when enabled.

Changes

Files/Groups Change Summary
server/server.go Added dynamic tools support: new internal struct, WithDynamicTools option, dynamic tools listing, validation, and handling integrated into existing tool management and call flow.

Possibly related issues

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.64.8)

Error: you are using a configuration file for golangci-lint v2 with golangci-lint v1: please use golangci-lint v2
Failed executing command with error: you are using a configuration file for golangci-lint v2 with golangci-lint v1: please use golangci-lint v2

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
server/server.go (1)

969-1005: Map merge is OK, but ordering work can be simplified

The current merge:

  1. Builds a map[string]mcp.Tool
  2. Converts it back to slice
  3. Sorts

Since tools is already sorted, an alternative is to:

  • Append dynamic tools to the slice
  • Use slices.CompactFunc + slices.SortFunc once

This removes the extra allocations of the map and second slice, benefiting large tool sets. Not blocking but worth considering if dynamicTools.listFunc can return hundreds/thousands of entries.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 607df92 and 60a105d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/server.go (5 hunks)

- Add required validateFunc parameter for tool validation
- Add tool capabilities registration for dynamic tools
- Add startup validation with panic for nil functions
- Simplify runtime checks (no redundant nil checks)
- Address bot feedback on parameter validation and capabilities
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60a105d and b561584.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/server.go (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
server/server.go (4)

49-55: Well-designed struct for dynamic tools configuration.

The dynamicTools struct is cleanly designed with appropriate fields for managing dynamic tool functionality. The addition of validateFunc is particularly good as it allows proper validation before handling tool calls.


166-166: Good integration of dynamic tools into server struct.

The pointer field allows for optional dynamic tools functionality with proper nil checking.


300-324: Excellent implementation addressing previous review feedback.

This function properly implements the validation and capability registration requested in previous reviews:

  • Validates that all functions are non-nil when enabled=true
  • Calls implicitlyRegisterToolCapabilities() to ensure clients know tools exist
  • Uses panic for fail-fast behavior during misconfiguration

The implementation correctly addresses the concerns raised in past review comments.


982-1018: Correct implementation of dynamic tool listing with proper priority.

The dynamic tools integration is well-implemented:

  • Dynamic tools have lowest priority (added first, then overridden by static/session tools)
  • Proper error handling for the list function
  • Maintains consistent sorting behavior
  • Clean merge logic using map-based approach

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant