Skip to content

refactor: rename DummyProcess to FallbackProcess in Windows stdio #1015

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2025

Conversation

felixweinberger
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • Renames DummyProcess to FallbackProcess for better clarity
  • More descriptive name that reflects its purpose as a fallback implementation

Context

This builds on #596 which fixes Windows subprocess compatibility. The rename was requested to better communicate that this is a fallback mechanism used when the standard async subprocess support is unavailable on Windows.

Test plan

  • All existing tests pass
  • No functional changes, only a class rename

felixweinberger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
Merging, rename for `DummyProcess` -> `FallbackProcess` coming in #1015
More descriptive name that better reflects its purpose as a fallback
implementation for Windows subprocess handling when asyncio support
is unavailable.
@felixweinberger felixweinberger force-pushed the fweinberger/rename-dummy-to-fallback-process branch from 4e13639 to d5fa7b9 Compare June 24, 2025 14:09
@felixweinberger felixweinberger requested review from ihrpr and removed request for jspahrsummers, jerome3o-anthropic and ihrpr June 24, 2025 14:09
Copy link
Contributor

@ihrpr ihrpr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@ihrpr ihrpr merged commit 4d45bb8 into main Jun 24, 2025
20 of 21 checks passed
@ihrpr ihrpr deleted the fweinberger/rename-dummy-to-fallback-process branch June 24, 2025 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants